Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Appellate Court of Illinois· 9/7/1999

People v. Jaudon

Citations

  • 718 N.E.2d 647
  • 307 Ill. App. 3d 427
  • 241 Ill. Dec. 76

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “while innocence may raise a constitutional question, it will not be an operative constitutional deficiency where *** there is direct privity between the owner and the wrongdoer”
  • noting that two of the defendants did not own the vehicles they were driving when arrested and explaining that there was conflicting evidence as to whether a third defendant co-owned the car with his grandmother
  • noting that two of the defendants did not own the vehicles they were driving when arrested and explaining that there was conflicting evidence as to whether a third defendant co-owned the car with his grandmother
  • finding the regulation of firearms possession and transportation was a legitimate governmental interest and an impoundment ordinance did not violate the vehicle owner’s substantive due process rights
  • finding two sections of Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 did not preempt ordinance
  • finding two sections of Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 did not preempt ordinance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Jaudon

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.