Skip to main content

People v. James S.

Citations

  • 904 N.E.2d 1072
  • 388 Ill. App. 3d 1102
  • 328 Ill. Dec. 562
  • 2009 Ill. App. LEXIS 102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court’s statement, “having heard the testimony and observed the witnesses,” was an insufficient finding of fact under section 3-816(a) for the involuntary administration of psychotropic medication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wexstten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. James S.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.