People v. James C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it named the respondent (the mother’s paramour) as the perpetrator [of] the sexual abuse in J.B.’s case”
• granting parents the right to be heard, present evidence, and cross-examine witnesses in proceedings involving the custody of minor children
• where father conceded he was unable to care for minor, issue of whether the trial court's additional finding that he was also unfit was moot

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• In re A.C.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2024-08-26

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Interest of Lakita B.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-06-30· cited 74×
• People v. D.L.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-02-20· cited 30×
• Perry v. Minor
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-02-27· cited 25×
• Department of Children & Family Services v. G.M.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-05-19· cited 6×