People v. Jacobs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating cross-examination is “an area that falls within the ambit of trial strategy and cannot sustain an ineffectiveness claim”
• stating cross- examination is \an area that falls within the ambit of trial strategy and cannot sustain an ineffectiveness claim\
• stating cross- examination is \an area that falls within the ambit of trial strategy and cannot sustain an ineffectiveness claim\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Peterson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-12-27· cited 37×
• People v. Fellers
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2017-07-26· cited 28×
• People v. Hogan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-03-11· cited 22×
• People v. Shevock
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-11-12· cited 13×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• People v. Vance
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1979-05-24· cited 152×
• People v. Albanese
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1988-09-29· cited 100×
• People v. Anderson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1986-03-19· cited 55×
• People v. Johnson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-08-18· cited 42×
• People v. Brown
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-07-30· cited 23×
• People v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-04-30· cited 18×
• People v. Hardeman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-09-19· cited 16×
• People v. Taylor
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-07-21· cited 15×
• People v. Cordevant
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-06-19· cited 14×
• People v. Thomas
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-11-10· cited 5×