People v. Jacobs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Compliance with the requirements of the [IAD] is essential.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Moody
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1984-01-30· cited 301×
• State v. Tarango
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-02-19· cited 35×
• Stroup v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1982-12-27· cited 30×
• People v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1981-12-14· cited 16×
• Whitley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1980-06-17· cited 14×
• Johnson v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1997-06-16· cited 14×
• People v. Greenwald
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1985-07-08· cited 8×
• People v. Quintana
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1984-10-01· cited 7×
• Romans v. Dist. Ct. in & for Eighth Jud. Dist.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1981-09-14· cited 4×
• People v. Thornton
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1994-07-14· cited 2×
• Romans v. District Court ex rel. Eighth Judicial District
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1981-09-14· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Willie Decoster, Jr.
  D.C. Circuit· 1973-12-27· cited 525×
• Harrington v. DIST. CT. IN AND FOR COUNTY OF MORGAN
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1977-01-24· cited 44×
• Hughes v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR CITY, ETC.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1979-04-23· cited 31×
• People v. Blalock
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1979-03-26· cited 24×
• Hicks v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1961-09-18· cited 17×
• People v. Lopez
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1978-07-06· cited 16×
• Grant v. Gwyn
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1961-09-25· cited 4×