People v. Jackson (Robert)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[i]n a factual-sufficiency review, the appellate court must consider whether disputed evidence is such that a reasonable factfinder could not have resolved it in favor of the finding”
• “The distinction between legal and factual sufficiency lies in the extent to which disputed evidence contrary to a finding may be considered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).