Michigan Supreme Court· 7/10/2009
People v. Jackson
Citations
- 483 Mich. 271
- 769 N.W.2d 630
- 2009 Mich. LEXIS 1569
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a challenge to whether MCL 769.1k applied must be raised “when the trial court imposes the fee,” otherwise “the claim of error will be seen as unpreserved”
- stating that strictly legal challenges to the imposition of fees and costs under MCL 769.1k must be made when the trial court imposes the fee or will be considered unpreserved
- stating that strictly legal challenges to the imposition of fees and costs under MCL 769.1k must be made when the trial court imposes the fee or will be considered unpreserved
- declining to address -4- constitutionality of 20% late fee when there was no indication defendant was ever assessed the fee
- declining to address -4- constitutionality of 20% late fee when there was no indication defendant was ever assessed the fee
- in determining defendant's ability to pay, judge must consider \whether the defendant remains indigent and whether repayment would cause manifest hardship\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kelly, Weaver, Corrigan, Young, Markman, Hathaway, Cavanagh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State of Iowa v. Charles Raymond AlbrightSupreme Court of Iowa· 2019-03-22· cited 168×
- People v. Konopka (On Remand)Michigan Court of Appeals· 2015-03-03· cited 161×
- People v. NunleyMichigan Supreme Court· 2012-07-12· cited 160×
- People v. FackelmanMichigan Supreme Court· 2011-07-28· cited 130×
- People of Michigan v. Selesa Arrosieur LikineMichigan Supreme Court· 2012-07-31· cited 62×
- Commonwealth v. HenryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2016-08-08· cited 36×
- Adair v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court· 2010-07-14· cited 29×
- Kyle Joseph Anderson v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2014-06-11· cited 19×
- People v. WoolseyMichigan Supreme Court· 2009-11-20· cited 1×
- People v. CoxMichigan Supreme Court· 2009-10-23· cited 1×
- People v. DeWulfMichigan Supreme Court· 2009-09-28· cited 1×
- People v. WashingtonMichigan Supreme Court· 2009-09-28· cited 1×
- People v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court· 2009-09-28· cited 1×
- People v. EveretteMichigan Supreme Court· 2009-09-28· cited 1×
- People v. LawsonMichigan Supreme Court· 2009-09-28· cited 1×
- People of Michigan v. Timothy Alan GreenwaldMichigan Supreme Court· 2012-04-20
- People v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court· 2009-10-26
- People v. GrayMichigan Supreme Court· 2009-09-28
- People v. PadillaMichigan Supreme Court· 2009-09-28
- People v. StennettMichigan Supreme Court· 2009-09-28
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1983-05-24· cited 1,941×
- Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court· 1974-05-20· cited 365×
- James v. StrangeSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 286×
- Sidun v. Wayne County TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court· 2008-07-02· cited 109×
- People v. GrantMichigan Supreme Court· 1997-07-15· cited 98×
- People v. DunbarMichigan Court of Appeals· 2004-12-22· cited 43×
- People v. MusicMichigan Supreme Court· 1987-07-20· cited 16×
- People v. TrappMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-09-09· cited 7×
- People v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court· 2008-02-08· cited 6×
- People v. MusicMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-01-21· cited 5×
- People v. TrappMichigan Supreme Court· 2008-11-05· cited 4×
- Lawrence M. Clarke, Inc. v. Richco Const., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court· 2008-06-27· cited 4×
- People v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court· 2009-01-28· cited 3×
- People v. BanksMichigan Supreme Court· 2008-11-14· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.