People v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[t]he potential for prejudicial inferences to be drawn from such a weapon in evidence far exceeds any legitimate purpose identified by the State in the present case and must be condemned”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Evans
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-05-24· cited 98×
• People v. Othman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2020-04-07· cited 20×
• People v. DeCesare
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-11-17· cited 17×
• People v. Salcedo
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-06-09· cited 9×
• People v. Jones
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-06-16· cited 7×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. La Pointe
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1982-01-29· cited 680×
• People v. Wade
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-07-25· cited 65×
• People v. Devine
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-07-24· cited 61×
• People v. Mendoza
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-07-13· cited 60×
• People v. Rickard
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-09-01· cited 32×
• People v. Sanders
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-04-18· cited 26×
• People v. Reed
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-01-31· cited 25×
• People v. Suerth
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-06-25· cited 21×
• People v. Andrews
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-04-06· cited 19×
• People v. Gray
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-12-21· cited 19×
• People v. Sui Wing Eng
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-11-14· cited 13×
• People v. Woods
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-02-28· cited 12×
• United States of America, Ex Rel. Phillip Peeples v. James Greer, Warden, Menard, Michael Lane, Director of the Department of Corrections
  Seventh Circuit· 1984-07-20· cited 9×