Skip to main content

People v. Jackson

Citations

  • 949 N.E.2d 215
  • 409 Ill. App. 3d 631
  • 350 Ill. Dec. 727
  • 2011 Ill. App. LEXIS 413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial judge considered evidence outside record where the court stated “ ‘[m]ental acuity is constantly misrepresented in the circumstances of the testimony that I hear from the witness stand in this building.’ ”
  • reviewing for plain error a forfeited argument that the trial court improperly relied on matters outside the record
  • “In a bench trial, the danger of prejudice due to the trial judge’s questions to a witness is lessened.”
  • “A trial court abuses its discretion when it adopts the role of advocate for one of the parties.”
  • error at bench trial for court to question witness in way suggesting it prejudged outcome before hearing all evidence
  • where the trial court allegedly abandoned its role as neutral arbiter, the issue was reviewable under the second prong of the plain error doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Connors

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.