People v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a claim that sentences imposed were excessive necessarily includes the issue of the one act-one crime theory.
• a claim that sentences imposed were excessive necessarily includes the issue of the one-act-one-crime theory
• a claim that sentences imposed were excessive necessarily includes the issue of the one act-one crime theory.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Ford
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-03-19· cited 40×
• People v. Schultz
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-07-03· cited 29×
• People v. Fisher
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-07-19· cited 27×
• People v. Moshier
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-04-20· cited 26×
• People v. Holliday
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-04-26· cited 14×
• People v. Keefer
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-05-29· cited 10×
• People v. Rogers
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-03-31· cited 8×
• People v. Timmons
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-08-31· cited 8×
• People v. Depner
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-10-16· cited 7×
• People v. Russell
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-02-28· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. King
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-05-20· cited 1,292×
• The PEOPLE v. Stewart
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1970-05-20· cited 108×
• People v. Manning
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1978-03-23· cited 92×
• People v. Cox
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-11-30· cited 84×
• People v. Israel
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1915-10-27· cited 27×
• People v. Ford
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-12-02· cited 21×
• People Ex Rel. Bassin v. Isreal
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-09-11· cited 20×