People v. Jack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that California Penal Code § 3001(a) requires that parolees be provided with parole retention decisions
• explaining that California Penal Code § 3001(a) requires that parolees be provided with parole retention decisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Stone
  California Court of Appeal· 2011-07-19
• O'Keeffe v. Rimmer
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-07-07

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Leon
  Supreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
• In Re Bowers
  California Court of Appeal· 1974-06-28· cited 13×
• In Re Nesper
  California Court of Appeal· 1990-01-31· cited 8×
• In Re Ruzicka
  California Court of Appeal· 1991-05-23· cited 6×
• In Re Roa
  California Court of Appeal· 1991-09-05· cited 5×