People v. ISUNZA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming conviction for aggravated battery where the defendant only intended to commit criminal damage to property by hitting car window with bat
• finding defendant accountable for vehicular invasion, where his codefendant reached into the victim’s open car window and punched her twice in the head, thus satisfying the element of “using force to reach into a vehicle” to commit a felony, aggravated battery
• finding defendant accountable for vehicular invasion, where his codefendant reached into the victim’s open car window and punched her twice in the head, thus satisfying the element of “using force to reach into a vehicle” to commit a felony, aggravated battery
• defendant committed vehicular invasion by reaching into the vehicle’s open window and punching the victim’s head
• “A court should not construe a statute in a manner that would lead to consequences that are absurd, inconvenient, or unjust”
• defendant committed vehicular invasion by reaching into the vehicle’s - 17 - 1-14-1780 open window and punching the victim’s head

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).