Skip to main content
· 6/15/1881

People v. Hydrostatic Paper Co.

Citations

  • 32 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 64

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a subsequent decision revealing a prior decision to be in error does not preclude the application of res judicata
  • noting that a subsequent decision revealing a prior decision to be in error does not preclude the application of res judicata

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.