People v. Hunt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The general rule is that the prosecution is not required to call as witnesses all persons who have knowledge of an offense alleged to have been committed by the defendant on trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Nieto
  California Court of Appeal· 1966-12-20· cited 40×
• People v. Harrison
  California Court of Appeal· 1969-10-22· cited 38×
• State v. Padilla
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2007-08-16· cited 33×
• People v. Neese
  California Court of Appeal· 1969-04-23· cited 22×
• People v. Flores
  California Court of Appeal· 1967-08-29· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Adamson
  California Supreme Court· 1946-01-04· cited 204×
• People v. Reingold
  California Court of Appeal· 1948-09-02· cited 50×
• People v. Toms
  California Court of Appeal· 1958-08-22· cited 20×
• People v. Garcia
  California Court of Appeal· 1960-12-05· cited 18×