· 6/21/2011
People v. Hume
Citations
- 196 Cal. App. 4th 990
- 126 Cal. Rptr. 3d 824
- 2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 791
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prosecutor’s argument to jury suggesting that defense counsel didn’t believe his client, even if not objected to, required reversal
- prosecutor's argument to jury suggesting that defense counsel didn't believe his client, even if not objected to, required reversal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reardon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.