People v. Huffman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding burden of proving freedom from culpable negligence not met because the defendant “did not allege any specific dates of when he learned of the allegedly new evidence”
• finding burden of proving freedom from culpable negligence not met because the defendant \did not allege any specific dates of when he learned of the allegedly new evidence\
• “defendant’s allegation that he was unfamiliar with the controlling limitations period is insufficient to establish a delay not due to his culpable negligence”
• \defendant's allegation that he was unfamiliar with the controlling limitations period is insufficient to establish a delay not due to his culpable negligence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Walker
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-06-26· cited 23×
• People v. Lopez
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-12-06· cited 12×
• People v. Stewart
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-12-18· cited 12×
• People v. Parham
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-01-30· cited 9×
• People v. Gunartt
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-01-24· cited 9×
• People v. Allen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-05-11· cited 6×
• People v. Walker Modification of May 15, 2002, opinion upon denial of rehearing.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-06-26

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Wright
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1999-11-18· cited 117×
• People v. Bates
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1988-06-20· cited 82×
• People v. Van Hee
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-06-08· cited 36×
• People v. Heirens
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-03-15· cited 30×
• People v. Paarlberg
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-04-09· cited 21×
• People v. Stenson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-04-17· cited 12×