Skip to main content
· 6/20/2001

People v. H.S.H.

Citations

  • 322 Ill. App. 3d 892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing, however, that no statute or supreme court rule requires such exclusion
  • observing, however, that no statute or supreme court rule requires such exclusion
  • If the court’s order is unclear, one may not be punished for any perceived violation.
  • “Although there is no statute or supreme court rule that mandates that witnesses be excluded from the courtroom during a trial, it is well settled that the trial court possesses the discretion to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rapp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.