People v. Houston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• following remand and reconstruction of a bystander’s report, the court found that even if voir dire had been recorded, defendant could not have shown prejudice
• rejecting the defendant’s ineffective-assistance-of-trial-counsel claim because the reconstructed record showed that counsel’s waiver of the court reporter during voir dire did not prejudice the defendant
• on appeal, defendant claimed that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request IPI Criminal 4th No. 3.15
• state appellate defender argued that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request IPI Criminal 4th No. 3.15
• the defendant’s counsel waived the presence of the court reporter by affirmatively agreeing that the reporter’s presence was unnecessary
• on appeal, defendant claimed that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to request IPI Criminal 4th No. 3.15

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).