People v. House

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• proof of a prior consistent statement made by a witness is inadmissible hearsay, which may not be used to bolster a witness’s testimony
• proof of a prior consistent statement made by a witness is inadmissible hearsay, which may not be used to bolster a witness’s testimony
• conflict of interest of defendant’s chosen counsel warranted disqualification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Stull
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-04-01· cited 64×
• People v. Belknap
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-11-18· cited 21×
• People v. Applewhite
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2017-02-15· cited 16×
• Burnette v. Terrell
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2009-03-19· cited 13×
• People v. Ortega
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2021-06-30· cited 9×
• People v. Webb
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2020-07-02· cited 3×
• People v. Webb
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2020-06-01· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wheat v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-30· cited 1,962×
• People v. Heard
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 246×
• People v. Ortega
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2004-04-01· cited 146×
• People v. Holmes
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-11-30· cited 141×
• People v. Lego
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1995-12-21· cited 67×
• People v. Richardson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-05-26· cited 21×
• People v. Calderon
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-12-06· cited 14×
• People v. James
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-10-13· cited 8×
• People v. Downey
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-09-07· cited 3×