Skip to main content
· 1/28/2011

People v. Horsman

Citations

  • 406 Ill. App. 3d 984
  • 943 N.E.2d 139
  • 347 Ill. Dec. 849
  • 2011 Ill. App. LEXIS 46
  • 2011 WL 331778

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that an issue of statutory interpretation raises a question that is of a public nature
  • recognizing that an issue of statutory interpretation raises a question that is of a public nature
  • finding that the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine applied to an issue of first impression
  • finding that the public interest exception to the mootness doctrine applied to an issue of first impression
  • addressing whether electronic home monitoring was a form of imprisonment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zenoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.