People v. Horoho

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting recovery of damages under subsection (a)(3) would render subsection (a)(2) superfluous, \a result contrary to a fundamental cannon of statutory construction\
• “Several courts have nevertheless held that section 409(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).