People v. Home Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that medical information was not a \thing of value\ within the meaning of the theft statute because the General Assembly had not defined it as such
• generally acknowledging four forms of the tort of invasion of privacy, but declining formally to recognize or define the scope of such claims
• generally acknowledging four forms of the tort of invasion of privacy, but declining formally to recognize or define the scope of such claims
• where General Assembly provided for the confidentiality of medical records but imposed no criminal sanctions for invasion of such confidentiality, violation could not be criminally prosecuted as theft
• where General Assembly provided for the confidentiality of medical records but imposed no criminal sanctions for invasion of such confidentiality, violation could not be criminally prosecuted as theft

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).