People v. Holveck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, by allowing the media to attend, the judge preserved the defendant’s sixth amendment right to a public trial; the trial judge considered that the media presence is, in effect, the presence of the public
• stating it agreed “with the State that the trial judge’s order here needed to satisfy only the requirements of section 115-11”
• stating it agreed “with the State that the trial judge’s order here needed to satisfy only the requirements of section 115-11”
• stating the trial court properly invoked section 115-11, which does not violate the constitution
• finding waived State’s attempt to raise inevitable-discovery doctrine for first time on appeal
• finding waived State's attempt to raise inevitable-discovery doctrine for first time on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).