Skip to main content

People v. Holt

Citations

  • 266 P.3d 442
  • 2011 Colo. App. LEXIS 1634
  • 2011 WL 4837640

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a juror’s statement regarding the severity of the charge was not relevant to the issues in the case because the jury does not consider punishment when deliberating
  • holding that the disclosure of extraneous information only requires a new trial if the information was “improperly before the jury” and it “posed the reasonable possibility of prejudice to the defendant” (quoting Kendrick v. Pippin, 252 P.3d 1052, 1063 (Colo. 2011))
  • first quoting CRE 606(b); and then quoting Kendrick v. Pippin, 252 P.3d 1052, 1063 (Colo. 2011)
  • juror improperly brought a dictionary definition of “elude” or “eluding” into jury room

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Casebolt, Concut, Criswell, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.