Appellate Court of Illinois· 4/21/1995

People v. Holt

Citations

649 N.E.2d 571
208 Ill. Dec. 515
271 Ill. App. 3d 1016
1995 Ill. App. LEXIS 283

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the defendant’s act of skating at a public ice rink was not constitutionally protected because the basis of his conviction was surveilling the victim during her reserved skating times with the intent to embarrass and annoy her
“[v]agueness claims against statutes that do not involve first amendment rights must be reviewed in the context of the specific case facts”
it is only when such statute is incapable of any valid application that it is unconstitutionally vague
it is only when such statute is incapable of any valid application that it is unconstitutionally vague
\[v]agueness claims against statutes that do not involve first amendment rights must be reviewed in the context of the specific case facts\
where statute prohibits conduct knowingly done to accomplish that which is prohibited, accused cannot claim he suffered from lack of warning or knowledge that his conduct violated the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lytton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.