People v. Holowko

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding \that the printout of results of computerized telephone tracing equipment is not hearsay evidence\ but rather \a self-generated record of its operations\
• explaining that a printout of data is “merely the tangible result of the computer’s internal operations”
• concluding “that the printout of results of computerized telephone tracing equipment is not hearsay evidence” but rather “ ‘a self-generated record of its operations, much like a seismograph [or] ... a flight recorder .... ’ ”
• concluding computer-generated records of telephone traces are not hearsay because the “evidence is generated instantaneously *** without the assistance, observations, or reports from or by a human declarant”
• records produced by computerized telephone-call tracing equipment without manual or human intervention are not hearsay evidence
• records produced by computerized telephone-call tracing equipment without manual or human intervention are not hearsay evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• State v. Hall
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1998-09-21· cited 732×
• People v. Furby
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-09-26· cited 151×
• State v. Meeks
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1993-08-05· cited 124×
• People v. Bynum
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-02-04· cited 99×
• United States v. Washington
  Fourth Circuit· 2007-08-22· cited 92×
• United States v. Lamons
  Eleventh Circuit· 2008-07-03· cited 74×
• United States v. Hamilton
  Tenth Circuit· 2005-06-28· cited 60×
• People v. Virgin
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-12-21· cited 39×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-06-08· cited 37×
• Penny v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-07-05· cited 35×
• People v. Kent
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2017-09-18· cited 30×
• State v. Schuette
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2002-04-19· cited 26×
• People v. Hendricks
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-06-19· cited 25×
• People v. Tharpe-Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-02-19· cited 25×
• GE Money Bank v. Morales
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2009-09-25· cited 24×
• People v. Shinohara
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-06-29· cited 22×
• People v. Ethridge
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-03-24· cited 21×
• Commonwealth v. Royal
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2016-03-07· cited 19×
• Burleson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1991-01-25· cited 16×
• People v. Hagan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-07-30· cited 16×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Armstead
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1983-05-23· cited 57×
• Grand Liquor Co. v. Department of Revenue
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-06-01· cited 47×
• State v. Hibbs
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1972-09-27· cited 17×
• State v. Hibbs
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1973-03-05· cited 13×
• State v. Hibbs
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1972-01-14· cited 9×
• People v. Donohoo
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-10-21· cited 5×
• People v. Holowko
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-05-25· cited 3×
• Commonwealth v. Kurtz
  Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas· 1969-11-25· cited 1×

Other cases named People v. Holowko

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• People v. Holowko
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-05-25· cited 3×