People v. Holowko

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding \that the printout of results of computerized telephone tracing equipment is not hearsay evidence\ but rather \a self-generated record of its operations\
• explaining that a printout of data is “merely the tangible result of the computer’s internal operations”
• concluding “that the printout of results of computerized telephone tracing equipment is not hearsay evidence” but rather “ ‘a self-generated record of its operations, much like a seismograph [or] ... a flight recorder .... ’ ”
• concluding computer-generated records of telephone traces are not hearsay because the “evidence is generated instantaneously *** without the assistance, observations, or reports from or by a human declarant”
• records produced by computerized telephone-call tracing equipment without manual or human intervention are not hearsay evidence
• records produced by computerized telephone-call tracing equipment without manual or human intervention are not hearsay evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).