Skip to main content

People v. Holmes

Citations

  • 41 Ill. App. 3d 956
  • 354 N.E.2d 611
  • 1976 Ill. App. LEXIS 3052

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that arresting officers could properly testify that defendant’s shoe print had the same indentation on the left heel as the shoe print found at the scene of the crime, and the lack of expertise of the witnesses only went to the weight, not to the admissibility, of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mejda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.