Skip to main content
· 4/11/2022

People v. Hola

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the defendant does not have an absolute right to make tactical decisions that determine which theories of criminal liability are submitted to the jury”
  • stating that \the defendant does not have an absolute right to make tactical decisions that determine which theories of criminal liability are submitted to the jury\
  • defendant does not have absolute right to make tactical decisions that determine which theories of criminal liability are submitted to jury
  • no prejudice where jury instructed, over defendant’s objection, on involuntary manslaughter and defendant convicted of murder in the second degree
  • defendant does not have absolute right to make tactical decisions that determine which theories of criminal liability are submitted to jury
  • “contention that a defendant has an absolute right to make tactical decisions that determine which theories of criminal liability are submitted to the jury is erroneous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.