Skip to main content
· 1/9/1984

People v. Hlinka

Citations

  • 99 A.D.2d 497
  • 470 N.Y.S.2d 444
  • 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16687

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the legal question for the court on a motion to dismiss is whether the contested statements are reasonably susceptible of a defamatory connotation.”
  • statement that employees were terminated because they were less productive than the company desired protected as opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.