Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/10/2004

People v. Hill

Citations

819 N.E.2d 1285
353 Ill. App. 3d 961
289 Ill. Dec. 485
2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 1501

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the defendant’s acquiescence to a mistrial constituted implicit consent, precluding a later claim of double jeopardy
“[A]cquiescence constitutes implicit consent to a mistrial and precludes a later double-jeopardy claim.” (citing People v. Camden, 115 Ill. 2d 369, 378-79 (1987)
\[A]cquiescence constitutes implicit consent to a mistrial and precludes a later double-jeopardy claim.\ (citing People v. Camden , 115 Ill. 2d 369 , 378-79, 105 Ill.Dec. 227 , 504 N.E.2d 96 (1987)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steigmann, Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.