California Supreme Court· 11/18/1884
People v. Hicks
Citations
- 66 Cal. 103
- 4 P. 1093
- 1884 Cal. LEXIS 700
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Law—Robbery—Sufficiency of Information.—Where an information for robbery charges “ that the property taken was the personal property in the possession of one Frederick Schwartz, and that it was taken from the person and against the will of Schwartz,” this is a sufficient averment that the property belonged to Schwartz, and that it was taken from him by the defendant.</p>
Judges: McKee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. TufungaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-11-15· cited 201×
- People v. AmmermanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-09-04· cited 68×
- People v. WadeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1945-11-13· cited 34×
- People v. DozierCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1939-10-03· cited 18×
- People v. HanselmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-06-07· cited 18×
- McClure v. LenceAppellate Court of Illinois· 1953-03-04· cited 16×
- People v. Pacheco-RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1927-11-23
- Pueblo v. Pacheco RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1927-11-23
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.