Michigan Supreme Court· 12/18/1975

People v. Henry

Citations

236 N.W.2d 489
395 Mich. 367
1975 Mich. LEXIS 170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that “it is the duty of the circuit judge to see to it that the case goes to the jury in a clear and intelligent manner, so that they may have a clear and correct understanding of what it is they are to decide, and he shall state to them fully the law applicable to the facts”
stating that “it is the duty of the circuit judge to see to it that the case goes to the jury in a clear and intelligent manner, so that they may have a clear and correct understanding of what it is they are to decide, and he shall state to them fully the law applicable to the facts”
not error to include pending charges in the presentence report for the judge’s consideration
not error to include pending charges in the presentence report for the judge's consideration
“We recognize that a court generally has no duty to instruct the jury sua sponte regarding all lesser included offenses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, Coleman, Fitzgerald, Kavanagh, Levin, Lindemer, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.