People v. Henderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Sanders and holding that a post-conviction petition challenging a police search under the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments was successive when the petitioner had previously challenged the constitutionality of the search on direct appeal
• applying Sanders and holding that a post-conviction petition challenging a police search under the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments was successive when the petitioner had previously challenged the constitutionality of the search on direct appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Adams
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-09-20· cited 23×
• Terrell v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-07-10
• Terrell v. United States (Amended Opinion)
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2026-01-15

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sanders v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 2,713×
• The People v. Sprinkle
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1963-03-25· cited 153×
• The PEOPLE v. Hamby
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1965-03-18· cited 108×
• The PEOPLE v. Polansky
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1968-01-19· cited 35×
• The PEOPLE v. Keagle
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1967-03-29· cited 27×
• The PEOPLE v. Henderson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1965-09-28· cited 26×