· 9/12/1983
People v. Hemingway (In Re Hemingway)
Citations
- 39 B.R. 619
- 12 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 28
- 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13891
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the numerosity requirement for was satisfied where the state sought to represent six named consumers
- holding that state had parens patriae standing to prosecute dischargeability complaint as a representative of six consumers who were beneficiaries under a restitution order
- finding that New York Attorney General had standing to bring non-dischargeability action on behalf of six consumers
- finding parens patriae standing after “fully considering the future impact that an adverse decision to the State would have”
- state’s intervention on behalf of six named consumers was appropriate because “it must not be overlooked that such representation is part of a much broader scheme of consumer protection”
- finding standing on the basis of injuries to named consumers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Munson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.