People v. Heim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing to review a claim for the first time on appeal as an exception to the usual rule “because [the claim] involves an important constitutional question”
• defendant who photographed his 16-year-old niece
• defendant who photographed his 16-year-old niece

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Roberts
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2011-05-10· cited 93×
• People v. Johnson
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1996-03-05· cited 24×
• People v. Artman
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1996-09-27· cited 24×
• People v. Hill
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2010-07-23· cited 20×
• Monroe Beverage Co. v. Stroh Brewery Co.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-06-02· cited 6×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Hayes
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1985-02-01· cited 153×
• People v. Prieskorn
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1986-02-11· cited 61×
• People v. Gezelman
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1993-10-19· cited 12×
• People v. Munn
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1993-03-16· cited 11×