· 10/24/2017
People v. Hawkins (Master)
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Reed supersedes Central Hudson
- striking down on-premises exemption because it could not pass strict scrutiny as a content-based regulation
- “The [Tennessee] Billboard Act’s on- premises exception scheme is a content-based regulation of (restriction on) free speech.”
- “Because the on-premises exception is not severable from the Billboard Act, we must consider the Act as a whole”
- “The Billboard Act’s on-premises exception scheme is a content-based regulation of (restriction on) free speech.”
- “Tennessee’s Billboard Act contains a non-severable regulation of speech based on the content of the message.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.