People v. Havlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the defendant was not in custody and Miranda warnings were not required when the officer asked a general question regarding the ownership of contraband which had been found in a motor vehicle
• finding that the defendant was not in custody and Miranda warnings 14 No. 1-13-2046 were not required when the officer asked a general question regarding the ownership of contraband which had been found in a motor vehicle
• “Miranda warnings are not required where the police conduct a general on-the-scene investigation as to the facts surrounding a crime or other general questioning.”
• “ ‘Absent the interplay of custody and interrogation, an individual’s privilege against self-incrimination is not threatened.’ ”
• two officers were present at the scene

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).