· 1/13/1986
People v. Harrod
Citations
- 488 N.E.2d 316
- 140 Ill. App. 3d 96
- 94 Ill. Dec. 490
- 1986 Ill. App. LEXIS 1847
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- assuming, arguendo, that disablement of car was a startling event, statement regarding having just left lawyer’s office had nothing to do with car becoming disabled
- assuming, arguendo, that disablement of car was a startling event, statement regarding having just left lawyer's office had nothing to do with car becoming disabled
- assuming, arguendo, that disablement of car was a startling event, statement regarding having just left lawyer's office had nothing to do with car becoming disabled
- finding evidence sufficient in a prosecution for perjury when the defendant, an attorney, made a false statement under oath before the attorney disciplinary commission in regard to circumstances surrounding the execution of a client’s will
- finding evidence sufficient in a prosecution for perjury when the defendant, an attorney, made a false statement under oath before the attorney disciplinary commission in regard to circumstances surrounding the execution of a client's will
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Karns
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.