Skip to main content

People v. Harris

Citations

  • 580 N.E.2d 1342
  • 220 Ill. App. 3d 848
  • 163 Ill. Dec. 1
  • 1991 Ill. App. LEXIS 1759

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in-court identification may still be allowed if based on observation independent of and prior to the tainted out-of-court identification
  • theft-related offenses, such as armed robbery, obviously involve dishonesty and arguably reflect on a person’s likelihood of telling the truth when testifying as a witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.