· 3/11/2004
People v. Harman
Citations
- 97 P.3d 290
- 2004 Colo. App. LEXIS 345
- 2004 WL 439490
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- highlighting that the double jeopardy prohibition against increasing a legal sentence once the 6 defendant has begun serving it is to protect the defendant from being punished twice for the same offense
- in determining the amount of restitution, “the trial court should consult the . . . presentence reports”
- “[T]he restitution act contains standards both for the late provision of the restitution amount to the court by the prosecutor (‘extenuating circumstances’
- in determining the amount of restitution, \the trial court should consult the ... presentence reports\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marquez, Taubman, Webb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.