Skip to main content
· 3/11/2004

People v. Harman

Citations

  • 97 P.3d 290
  • 2004 Colo. App. LEXIS 345
  • 2004 WL 439490

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • highlighting that the double jeopardy prohibition against increasing a legal sentence once the 6 defendant has begun serving it is to protect the defendant from being punished twice for the same offense
  • in determining the amount of restitution, “the trial court should consult the . . . presentence reports”
  • “[T]he restitution act contains standards both for the late provision of the restitution amount to the court by the prosecutor (‘extenuating circumstances’
  • in determining the amount of restitution, \the trial court should consult the ... presentence reports\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marquez, Taubman, Webb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.