People v. Hargro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• doctrine of primary assumption is inapplicable to a Labor Law § 241(6) claim
• “The defendant’s contention that [plaintiff] made a decision to work at a live electrical panel with full knowledge of the risk of an electrical shock is relevant to the issue of [plaintiff’s] comparative negligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).