Michigan Supreme Court· 6/25/2002

People v. Hardiman

Citations

646 N.W.2d 158
466 Mich. 417

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that circumstantial evidence that the defendant resided in an apartment was sufficient to uphold a conviction for constructive possession
holding that, when evidence is relevant and admissible, it does not matter that the evidence gives rise to multiple inferences or that the inferences to be drawn give rise to further inferences
stating that “it is simply not the task of an appellate court to adopt inferences that the jury has spurned”
stating that, if evidence is relevant and admissible, it does not matter that the evidence gives rise to multiple inferences
stating that “it is simply not the task of an appellate court to adopt inferences that the jury has spurned”
stating that “it is simply not the task of an appellate court to adopt inferences that the jury has spurned”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanagh, Kelly, Weaver, Young, Markman, Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Hardiman

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.