· 4/20/1971
People v. Handy
Citations
- 16 Cal. App. 3d 858
- 94 Cal. Rptr. 387
- 1971 Cal. App. LEXIS 1644
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where compliance with the [CGCA] is 17 required, the plaintiff must allege compliance or circumstances excusing compliance, or the 18 complaint is subject to general demurrer.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kaus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.