People v. Handley
Citations
- 100 Cal. 370
- 34 P. 853
- 1893 Cal. LEXIS 801
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Daw—Arson—Information—Identification of House—Ownership Immaterial.—Where an information charging a defendant with the crime of arson contains a description of the house alleged to have been burned sufficient to identify it, regardless of the name of the owner, the ownership of the house, although alleged in the information, becomes immaterial as not being a necessary part of the description of the crime charged, and is not necessary to be proved.</p> <p>Id.—Pleading—Materiality of Allegations—Description Essential to Identity—Surplusage.—Every fact or circumstance necessary to constitute the crime charged must be alleged and proved, and an allegation otherwise not essential may become material, and must be proved in all cases when descriptive of the identity of that which is necessary to the charge; hut the allegation of a fact or circumstance not legally essential to the charge is mere surplusage, and may be disregarded.</p>
Judges: Fitzgerald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. DeysherCalifornia Supreme Court· 1934-12-27· cited 54×
- People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court· 1943-05-03· cited 50×
- People v. GeigerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-04-07· cited 23×
- People v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1938-05-24· cited 15×
- People v. McMillanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-06-11· cited 14×
- State v. DirectorOregon Supreme Court· 1924-03-11· cited 13×
- People v. LarueCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1938-10-25· cited 9×
- People v. McMillanAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 1941-06-11
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.