California Supreme Court· 6/26/1989

People v. Hamilton

Citations

774 P.2d 730
48 Cal. 3d 1142
259 Cal. Rptr. 701
1989 Cal. LEXIS 1506

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that a post-trial review of a change of venue motion is retrospective and involves an examination of the voir dire process
trial court concluded that 10 of 11 factors were aggravating, including factors (d)(h) and (j)
trial court concluded that 10 of 11 factors were aggravating, including factors (d)-(h) and (j)
after extensive plotting and numerous failed attempts, defendant twice shot and killed his pregnant wife, the mother of his four children; death penalty affirmed
after extensive plotting and numerous failed attempts, defendant twice shot and killed his pregnant wife, the mother of his four children; death penalty affirmed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagleson, Broussard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

118 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

101 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.