People v. Ham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that third-party interventions in criminal cases should only be allowed under “truly exceptional circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• A.M. v. A.C.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2013-02-25· cited 315×
• Duran v. Price
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1994-01-10· cited 48×
• People v. Green
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1987-03-23· cited 39×
• Meredith v. Zavaras
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1998-02-23· cited 25×
• State v. Figueroa
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-05-04· cited 13×
• McDonnell v. Juvenile Court
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1993-12-13· cited 12×
• State v. Johnson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2020-03-25· cited 11×
• White v. Adamek
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1995-10-26· cited 7×
• Moreland v. Alpert
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2005-10-06· cited 5×
• Martin-Costa v. Kiger
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-07-06· cited 3×
• State v. Johnson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2020-02-24
• People v. Hood
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1993-12-30

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-30· cited 1,758×
• Gannett Pacific Corp. v. Richardson
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1978-05-26· cited 87×
• People v. Watkins
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1984-06-25· cited 65×
• People v. Green
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1987-03-23· cited 39×
• State v. Bianchi
  Washington Supreme Court· 1979-04-30· cited 35×
• State v. Simants
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1975-12-12· cited 25×
• People v. Lockhart
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1985-05-06· cited 21×
• Kort v. Carlson
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1986-07-14· cited 8×
• NEWS AMERICAN DIV., HEARST CORP. v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-07-21· cited 4×