Skip to main content

People v. Hall

Citations

  • 999 P.2d 207
  • 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 1738
  • 2000 Colo. LEXIS 526
  • 2000 WL 361685

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a fact finder may infer the defendant’s awareness of a risk from what a reasonable person would have understood under the circumstances
  • “An actor is criminally negligent when he should have been aware of the risk but was not, while recklessness requires that the defendant actually be aware of the risk but disregard it.”
  • in reviewing dismissal of charge, appellate court reviews conclusions of law de novo
  • ―In addition to the actor‘s knowledge and experience, a court may infer the actor‘s subjective awareness of a risk from what a reasonable person would have understood under the circumstances.‖
  • ―In addition to the actor‘s knowledge and experience, a court may infer the actor‘s subjective awareness of a risk from what a reasonable person would have understood under the circumstances.‖
  • “The court must view all evidence and draw all inferences in favor of the prosecution, and the court must not accept the defendant’s ver sion of the facts over the legit imate inferences that can be drawn from the prosecution ’s evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

44 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.