Michigan Court of Appeals· 10/26/1981
People v. Haisha
Citations
- 314 N.W.2d 465
- 111 Mich. App. 165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- State was not required to disclose witness who would impeach defense witness’ testimony that she had been home with the defendant at time of crime
- lineup not impermissibly suggestive even though the defendant was the only participant of Arabic descent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burns, Holbrook, Glaser
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- People v. HortonMichigan Court of Appeals· 1980-06-04· cited 34×
- People v. GillmanMichigan Court of Appeals· 1976-01-06· cited 27×
- People v. Frederick LesterMichigan Court of Appeals· 1977-09-06· cited 19×
- People v. RivardMichigan Court of Appeals· 1975-03-12· cited 19×
- People v. McCarverMichigan Court of Appeals· 1978-11-07· cited 17×
- People v. HannaMichigan Court of Appeals· 1978-09-05· cited 16×
- People v. BarkerMichigan Court of Appeals· 1980-04-24· cited 15×
- People v. McCartneyMichigan Court of Appeals· 1973-04-26· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.