Skip to main content
· 7/7/1971

People v. Hairgrove

Citations

  • 18 Cal. App. 3d 606
  • 96 Cal. Rptr. 142
  • 1971 Cal. App. LEXIS 1415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • error for trial court to rule on motion for new trial on basis of newly discovered evidence without examining, under oath, witness who, after defendant’s trial, signed an affidavit confessing to acts for which defendant convicted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fleming

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.