People v. Hahn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering fact that there were “separate victims” as one consideration among several that established separate violent crimes
• rejecting the defendant's argument that the use of the word \separate\ in subsection 406(1)(a) demonstrates the legislature's intent to (a) allow consecutive sentences only where \two or more violent crimes result from two or more independent and unconnected acts\; and (b
• acts supporting two assault convictions were against two different victims in two different vehicles; evidence was not identical and so consecutive sentencing proper
• “[I]f guilt of two or more crimes of violence is established by identical evidence, the crimes are not ‘separate[.]’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Torrez
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2013-03-28· cited 550×
• People v. Page
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1995-03-02· cited 37×
• People v. Wilson
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1992-05-21· cited 4×
• People v. Espinoza
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2017-09-21· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Vigil
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1986-04-14· cited 854×
• Wafai v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1988-01-25· cited 19×
• People v. Hotopp
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1981-08-17· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Meehan
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1982-11-18· cited 12×
• People v. Wafai
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1986-02-24· cited 9×